The Hidden Revenue Leak in Private Practice: Why Therapists Must Stop Ignoring Copays, Coinsurance, and No-Show Fees

By Bruce Brown, Arkansas Mental Health Credentialing & Billing Services

There is a conversation I have with therapists in private practice more often than I would like:

“I don’t want to make my clients feel like I’m only concerned about money.”

I understand that.

Therapists enter this profession because they want to help people. They want to create a safe environment where clients can be vulnerable, honest, and supported. The last thing many clinicians want is to turn a therapeutic relationship into a discussion about an unpaid $30 copay.

But there is another side to this conversation that private-practice therapists need to hear:

Your practice is a business.

You can be compassionate and still collect what your clients legitimately owe.

You can care deeply about your clients and still have a cancellation policy.

You can offer financial hardship accommodations when appropriate and still expect clients who can pay to pay.

And, perhaps most importantly, you cannot provide sustainable mental health care if your practice continually absorbs costs that should have been collected.

For many therapists, the problem isn’t that they aren’t seeing enough clients.

The problem is that money is leaking out of the practice after the client has already been seen.

Your Fee Is Not Always Your Revenue

One of the most important concepts for a therapist in private practice is understanding the difference between the amount you charge, the amount an insurance company allows, the amount insurance pays, and the amount that the payer’s claim adjudication identifies as the patient’s responsibility, subject to the applicable plan and provider contract.

CMS defines copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles as forms of patient cost-sharing. A copayment is generally a fixed amount; coinsurance is generally a percentage of the allowed amount; and a deductible is the amount a patient must pay before the health plan begins paying for covered services subject to the deductible.

That means the payment from the insurance company is not necessarily the end of the financial transaction.

There may still be a legitimate patient balance.

For example, imagine a therapist has an insurance-contracted allowed amount of $120 for a therapy session. Suppose the patient’s benefit results in $30 of coinsurance.

If the therapist collects the insurance payment but routinely lets the $30 patient responsibility slide, the therapist isn’t simply being “nice.”

The practice is absorbing $30 of patient responsibility that the patient’s benefit design assigned to the patient.

Do that once and it may not feel significant.

Do it repeatedly, and the numbers change.

Consider a simple example

Suppose a therapist sees:

  • 25 clients per week
  • 48 weeks per year
  • An average patient responsibility of $25
  • 85% collection of that responsibility

At 100% collection, the annual patient-responsibility revenue represented by those visits would be:

25 × 48 × $25 = $30,000

At an 85% collection rate, $4,500 of that potential revenue remains uncollected.

That is not a claim that every therapist will lose $4,500. It is simply an illustration of how a relatively small amount per visit can become a meaningful annual number.

And that is before considering unpaid deductibles, coinsurance, outstanding balances, returned payments, or missed appointments.

Small leaks become large leaks when they happen hundreds or thousands of times.

Collecting Patient Responsibility Is Not the Same as Being Uncaring

This is where many therapists get uncomfortable.

They think:

“My client is struggling. I don’t want to make their financial situation worse.”

That concern is legitimate.

But there is a difference between being financially compassionate and having no financial boundaries.

In fact, professional ethics and Arkansas rules support having clear financial arrangements.

For Arkansas counselors, the state’s rules specifically require counselors to explain financial arrangements related to professional services before the counseling relationship begins. Arkansas rules also state that counselors should consider the client’s financial status and locality when establishing fees.

The American Psychological Association’s Ethics Code similarly says psychologists and recipients of psychological services should reach an agreement about compensation and billing arrangements as early as feasible. It also requires psychologists’ fee practices to be consistent with law and states that psychologists should discuss anticipated financial limitations with clients.

The National Association of Social Workers takes a similar approach. Its Code of Ethics says fees should be fair, reasonable, and commensurate with the services provided, with consideration given to the client’s ability to pay. It also recognizes that, in fee-for-service settings, services may in some circumstances be terminated when an overdue balance remains—provided the financial arrangements were clear and the clinical consequences of nonpayment have been addressed.

In other words:

A financial boundary is not inherently unethical.

An unclear or exploitative financial arrangement is a different matter.

Your Practice Has Expenses Whether Your Clients Pay You or Not

This is the part I wish more therapists would consider.

When you provide a therapy session, your practice incurs expenses regardless of whether you collect the patient’s responsibility.

You may have:

  • Office rent
  • An electronic health record
  • Billing expenses
  • Credentialing expenses
  • Professional liability insurance
  • Business insurance
  • Phone and internet service
  • Scheduling software
  • Credit-card processing fees
  • Payroll
  • Administrative staff
  • Taxes
  • Continuing education
  • Licensure expenses
  • Marketing
  • Website expenses
  • Technology
  • Utilities
  • Accounting and legal expenses

And, of course, there is the most valuable resource of all:

Your time.

A private practice cannot operate on good intentions alone.

If you routinely provide services for which a patient owes $30, $40, $60, or more—and then routinely decide not to collect it—you are effectively reducing your reimbursement for that service.

That may be a conscious decision.

But many therapists aren’t making a conscious decision.

They’re simply not collecting.

Those are two very different things.

The Difference Between a Financial Hardship Policy and a Collection Problem

There is absolutely nothing wrong with deciding that your practice will accommodate patients experiencing genuine financial hardship.

In fact, a thoughtful hardship policy can be a compassionate and clinically appropriate part of a private practice.

The problem is when every unpaid balance becomes a hardship exception simply because the therapist is uncomfortable asking for payment.

A sustainable practice should be able to answer questions such as:

  • Who qualifies for financial assistance?
  • What documentation, if any, is required?
  • Who approves an adjustment?
  • How long does the arrangement last?
  • Does the arrangement apply to future visits?
  • How is the arrangement documented?
  • Is the adjustment permitted under the applicable payer contract?
  • Does Medicare or Medicaid apply?
  • Is the same policy applied consistently to similarly situated clients?

The goal isn’t to become inflexible.

The goal is to replace ad hoc decisions with a thoughtful financial policy.

That protects both the client and the practice.

Be Careful With Copays and Coinsurance

This is an area where therapists should be particularly cautious.

A therapist should not assume that routinely waiving copays or coinsurance is simply a harmless act of generosity.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS OIG) has warned that routinely waiving Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary copayments, coinsurance, or deductibles can create federal fraud-and-abuse concerns, including potential Anti-Kickback Statute issues. Individual financial-hardship determinations and reasonable collection efforts can be treated differently, so therapists should not assume that every waiver is prohibited or that every waiver is permissible.

There are also important exceptions and special circumstances. For example, Medicare beneficiaries who qualify for the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) program generally cannot be billed for Medicare Part A and Part B cost-sharing amounts.

This is why a blanket policy such as:

“We never collect copays from clients who ask us not to”

is not a sound revenue strategy—or necessarily a compliant one.

Know your payer contracts. Know the applicable rules. Document your policies.

If you are unsure whether a particular adjustment or waiver is permitted, obtain appropriate compliance or legal guidance rather than guessing.

Don’t Forget the Good Faith Estimate for Self-Pay Clients

Not every patient responsibility situation involves insurance.

If a client does not have insurance—or chooses not to use insurance—the federal No Surprises Act generally requires providers to give an uninsured or self-pay patient a Good Faith Estimate of expected charges when the applicable scheduling requirements are met or when the patient requests an estimate.

For a private practice, that means your financial policy should address both insurance-based patient responsibility and self-pay expectations.

A Good Faith Estimate is not merely another form to put into an intake packet. It is part of creating a transparent financial relationship with clients.

If the final bill from a provider is at least $400 more than the provider’s Good Faith Estimate, federal law provides a patient-provider dispute process for eligible uninsured or self-pay patients.

The practical lesson: clear financial expectations should begin before the first session—not after a balance has already accumulated.

No-Show Fees: A Policy Is Only Useful If You Actually Enforce It

The same principle applies to missed appointments.

A therapist may spend an entire hour holding a clinical appointment that a client does not attend.

The therapist still spent the time.

The appointment slot was unavailable to another client.

The practice may still have overhead associated with that hour.

And yet many clinicians maintain a no-show or late-cancellation policy but rarely enforce it.

That creates a strange situation:

The practice has a policy that clients don’t actually have to follow.

If a client learns that missing an appointment results in no financial consequence—even though the practice’s written policy says otherwise—the policy gradually loses its meaning.

A missed-appointment policy should therefore be:

  1. Clearly written.
  2. Provided to the client before treatment begins.
  3. Easy for the client to understand.
  4. Consistent with applicable law and payer requirements.
  5. Applied consistently.
  6. Documented.
  7. Flexible enough to address genuine emergencies or appropriate clinical circumstances.

A no-show or late-cancellation fee is not the same thing as a copayment or coinsurance amount. It is generally a separate practice fee, and therapists should not assume that an insurance plan will pay it or that the fee can be billed to insurance. Before implementing or changing a missed-appointment fee, review the applicable payer contracts and professional rules.

The National Association of Social Workers’ practice standards specifically identify written fee agreements, payment procedures, cancellation policies, and related practice policies as important components of private practice procedures.

For Arkansas counselors, the state’s rules likewise emphasize explaining financial arrangements before the counseling relationship begins.

The key point is simple:

Don’t surprise your client with a fee. Establish the expectation before the appointment ever occurs.

Holding Clients Financially Accountable Can Actually Be Good Practice

This may sound counterintuitive, but clear financial boundaries can be beneficial to the therapeutic relationship.

When expectations are vague, financial conversations often become emotionally charged.

A client receives a bill they weren’t expecting.

The therapist feels uncomfortable.

The client feels embarrassed.

The therapist avoids the subject.

The balance grows.

Eventually, someone becomes frustrated.

That is not good for anyone.

A better approach is to make the financial expectations part of the normal administrative process.

The conversation becomes:

“Your insurance indicates that your responsibility for today’s visit is $30. We collect that at the time of service.”

rather than:

“I’m sorry to bring this up, but you still owe me $30 from several weeks ago…”

The first is routine.

The second feels personal.

Good systems take the emotion out of collection.

Make Payment Collection a Process, Not a Personality Trait

One of the biggest mistakes I see in private practice is allowing payment collection to depend on whether the therapist feels comfortable asking for money that day.

That’s not a system.

A stronger practice creates a repeatable process.

For example:

Before the first appointment

The practice provides:

  • Financial policy
  • Cancellation/no-show policy
  • Accepted payment methods
  • Insurance information
  • Patient responsibility expectations
  • Information about deductibles, copays, and coinsurance
  • Financial hardship procedures, if offered
  • Appropriate consent and acknowledgment forms

At or before each appointment

The practice verifies the information it reasonably can and communicates the expected patient responsibility. An eligibility estimate is not necessarily the final patient responsibility. Practices should follow the applicable payer contract and, when necessary, reconcile the patient balance after the claim is adjudicated.

After insurance processes the claim

The practice reviews the Explanation of Benefits and posts the patient’s responsibility accurately.

CMS explains that a patient’s medical bill can include a remaining balance based on deductible or coinsurance obligations after insurance has paid its portion.

When a balance exists

The practice has a defined process for:

  • Payment reminders
  • Payment plans, when appropriate
  • Financial hardship requests
  • Outstanding balances
  • Failed payments
  • Escalation of delinquent accounts

When a client repeatedly does not pay

The practice follows its written policy rather than improvising a new rule for every situation.

This is where professional billing support can make a significant difference.

The AMA Recognizes the Patient-Responsibility Problem Too

Therapists are not the only healthcare professionals dealing with this issue.

The American Medical Association notes that increasing deductibles and coinsurance have contributed to uncollected patient financial responsibility and describes patient bad debt as a significant practice-management problem. The AMA recommends point-of-care payment processes because collecting at the time of service can reduce accounts receivable, improve cash flow, decrease back-end collection costs, and reduce the administrative burden associated with unpaid patient debt.

That is important because it reinforces something private-practice therapists sometimes overlook:

Patient collections are not merely an administrative annoyance. They are part of practice financial health.

Let’s Put the “I’m a Therapist, Not a Businessperson” Idea to Rest

You are both.

If you own a private practice, you are a clinician and a business owner.

That does not mean you have to become obsessed with money.

It means you have to understand money well enough to keep the practice operating.

A financially healthy practice allows you to:

  • Continue seeing clients.
  • Pay your staff.
  • Maintain appropriate technology.
  • Invest in continuing education.
  • Maintain professional insurance.
  • Keep your office open.
  • Hire administrative help.
  • Reduce burnout caused by financial instability.
  • Potentially expand access to care.
  • Offer appropriate reduced-fee or pro bono services because you have a sustainable financial foundation.

Profitability and compassion are not opposites.

A profitable practice can provide compassionate care.

A financially unstable practice eventually has fewer choices.

Don’t Confuse Compassion With Avoiding Difficult Conversations

Therapists are trained to sit with difficult emotions.

But sometimes the most uncomfortable conversation is:

“You have an outstanding balance, and we need to discuss how we’re going to resolve it.”

That conversation doesn’t have to be harsh.

It can be respectful.

It can sound like:

“I want to make sure we’re taking care of the financial side of your care just as carefully as we’re taking care of the clinical side. Your account currently has a balance of $___ . Let’s review the balance together and determine the best way to resolve it.”

That’s not aggressive.

That’s professional.

And if the client genuinely cannot afford the balance, now you have an opportunity to discuss the situation rather than silently writing off the revenue.

Start Looking at Your Practice’s Revenue Leakage

If you want to improve the financial performance of your private practice, don’t automatically start by asking:

“How can I get more clients?”

First ask:

“How much revenue am I already generating that never makes it into my bank account?”

Look at the previous 6–12 months and identify:

  • Uncollected copays
  • Uncollected coinsurance
  • Uncollected deductibles
  • Outstanding patient balances
  • Written-off patient balances
  • Missed-appointment fees that were never charged
  • Late-cancellation fees that were waived
  • Returned payments
  • Claims that were never properly followed up
  • Incorrect insurance information
  • Underpayments
  • Denied claims
  • Timely-filing losses
  • Credits or refunds that were never properly reconciled

You may discover that your biggest opportunity isn’t attracting another 10 clients.

It may be collecting the revenue associated with the clients you already have.

A Simple Revenue-Leak Example

Consider a hypothetical therapist who sees 30 sessions per week.

Suppose just 5 sessions each week result in an average of $30 in patient responsibility that is never collected.

That’s:

5 × $30 = $150 per week

Over 48 working weeks:

$150 × 48 = $7,200

Again, this is an illustration—not a prediction of what any particular therapist will lose.

But it demonstrates the math.

The therapist doesn’t need to raise their fee.

They don’t need to add five more clients.

They don’t need another marketing campaign.

They simply need to stop allowing $30 balances to disappear five times a week.

That is what a revenue leak looks like.

The Goal Isn’t to Collect Every Dollar at Any Cost

This distinction matters.

The goal should not be:

“Collect every possible dollar from every client.”

The goal should be:

“Create a fair, transparent, compliant, and consistently administered financial system that collects legitimate patient responsibility while allowing appropriate exceptions when warranted.”

That is a much better standard.

A good private practice should have room for:

  • Compassion
  • Financial hardship
  • Emergencies
  • Clinical judgment
  • Payment arrangements
  • Appropriate fee adjustments
  • Pro bono services

But those should be intentional decisions, not the default result of avoiding uncomfortable conversations.

Your Practice Deserves to Be Paid

There is nothing selfish about wanting your practice to be financially healthy.

You invested years of education, training, supervision, licensure, continuing education, and professional development to become a therapist.

You provide a service that matters.

Your practice has real expenses.

Your time has value.

And your clients deserve clarity about what their care will cost.

The healthiest mindset is not:

“I don’t want to charge my clients.”

It is:

“I want my clients to understand their financial responsibility, and I want my practice to have a fair and consistent system for handling it.”

That is not putting money before people.

It is building a practice that can continue serving people.

Five Questions Every Private-Practice Therapist Should Ask

If you own a private practice, ask yourself:

1. Do I know exactly how much patient responsibility I am currently leaving uncollected?

If you don’t know the number, start measuring it.

2. Do my clients receive my financial policies before treatment begins?

If the answer is no, your financial expectations may not be as clear as you think they are.

3. Do I have a consistent process for copays, coinsurance, deductibles, and outstanding balances?

If collection depends on whether you personally remember to ask, there is an opportunity for improvement.

4. Do I consistently enforce my cancellation and no-show policy?

If not, ask why.

Is the policy too harsh? Rewrite it.

Does it need appropriate exceptions? Add them.

Are you simply uncomfortable enforcing it? That’s a different problem.

5. Am I treating my practice like a business?

You don’t have to become a corporate healthcare organization.

But you do need systems.

Clinical excellence and financial discipline can—and should—exist in the same practice.

The Bottom Line

Therapists do not have to choose between helping people and running a profitable private practice.

The two goals can coexist.

In fact, financial sustainability makes continued service possible.

The answer isn’t to become aggressive with clients.

The answer isn’t to nickel-and-dime people who genuinely cannot afford care.

And the answer isn’t to blindly waive every patient responsibility because asking for payment feels uncomfortable.

The answer is to establish clear financial policies, communicate them early, understand payer requirements, document appropriately, offer reasonable accommodations when appropriate, and consistently follow the practice’s own policies.

Your clients deserve compassionate care.

Your practice deserves to be paid.

And if you are consistently failing to collect legitimate patient responsibility, you may not have a client-volume problem.

You may have a revenue-leak problem.

A Note for Arkansas Therapists

Arkansas therapists should remember that the rules governing financial arrangements can differ depending on professional license, payer, program, and the circumstances of the client.

For example, Arkansas’s counseling rules require counselors to explain financial arrangements related to professional services before the counseling relationship begins and address fee-setting considerations related to the client’s financial status and locality.

Medicare also has specific cost-sharing requirements and exceptions, including protections for certain Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries.

Therefore, this article is intended as practice-management education, not legal, tax, or payer-specific compliance advice. Therapists should review their payer contracts, applicable federal and state requirements, professional ethics rules, and individual practice policies before implementing changes to patient billing or fee collection.

Sources & Further Reading

About Arkansas Mental Health Credentialing Services: We work with mental health professionals and understand that building a successful private practice involves much more than obtaining a credential or joining an insurance network. Credentialing, payer enrollment, billing practices, reimbursement, and ongoing practice management all play a role in building a financially sustainable practice.

Contact Us Today:

Empower your private practice with seamless billing management, freeing you to prioritize exceptional patient care. Reach out today and streamline your administrative workload effortlessly!

GET IN TOUCH

Do you have questions or need assistance?  Reach out to us today!

Your success is our priority. Whether you have questions or need assistance, we’re here to support you every step of the way. Reach out to us today and let’s unlock your full potential together!